In an interview with "Preimuschestvo.Ru" Courageous Goltsblat, ruling companion Goltsblat BLP, told the role of metropolitan office BLP in the texture of the mass in which the ratings takes an involved his firm, commented resonant transitions partnership, explained why did not believe in the importance of reform GC, and even admitted if Sergei Pepelyaev had nothing diskussirovat.
In the not so long ago released the ranking Financial Times Law 50 your company has gone into the five most innovatorskih. Say, if perhaps a crystal furror advertising, recognition of your old times awards. Do you agree?- The idea here is not the slightest lack of advertising furrora, so if the rating of FT, in my opinion, quite objective and impartial. All kinds of promotional aspirations, which does not have because of a content, will only lead to empty waste of money. Most of this, if you will renew in the absence of content is devoted to management, through a time elementary fail as unsupported content management - road to nowhere.
- The Western ratings are often condemned because of lack of understanding of the Russian situation. For anybody not a secret, though almost all scientists zabugornye Russian market act in accordance with the principle: "if you give us a tell, and we later decide if the principle, and if - lacking." Have a good chance if they are in this case the judge about the quality of the company?
- As if the truth probably is that way, though at least some of the ratings needed to deal with a critical, but this painstakingly prepare the information. Need to carefully tell, if you give yourself out. However, if follow your logic, it means that if Linklaters, Freshfields and the company of like not bad just marketing. I emphatically did not agree with that statement. Legal services - perhaps a business implementation. What is allowed to trade, not telling about themselves, about their own product on their own advocates and practices? However, for this, so it was as if to say, you need a high quality product.
- And according to what principle you rob ratings, which take part as well as the preparation of all orders - great work and significant short-term costs before only by the partners?
- We will take part in society generally recognized professor and distinguished ratings, to which treat our customers the choice of counsel in that or any other jurisdiction.
- Are polling customers what ratings they look?
- What is missing, does not answer the query. Because 20 years I formed a native consciousness about the quality of ratings, as customers and partners, whom we recommend services that are often required to orient the space of just a certain rating.
- If enough aggregate causes that is superior to the buyer the choice of legal counsel, due to 100 percent, what percentage portion of the company's ratings?
- Thoughts from 10 to 30 percent. However, according to different customers are different.
- Russian ratings are provided?
- I never heard that the buyer sent a huge interest in the Russian ratings. Truth and their lack, according to the essence of the case. Attempt, which took you (is there a rating form "Preimuschestvo.Ru-300" - Preimuschestvo.Ru) - probably the single most-least serious. All previous ratings in general than any of. Consistent with the latter measure, they did not give the slightest comprehension of this, though of itself gives a certain law firm.
- Consistent with infy Legal Week, from May 2010 May 2011 according to BLP profit totaled 229 million pounds, up to 20% more than in past economic year. What is the contribution of Russian cabinet in these numbers?
- We probably due to time risen by 25%, earning $ 24 million in a single pot probably expected 7%.
- How much space in the middle of rooms you occupy according to BLP grounds cash?
- Consistent with the dynamics of formation and in absolute figures, we go a descent afterward in London. Other rooms are not massive. However, keep in mind if an international expansion of the company near the source only 3 years back.
- How to legally and decorated Union Goltsblat BLP?
- I am considered a partner in the firm's mass BLP. At least some of a mate Goltsblat BLP because these conditions.
- Other partners are the capital's office on those because the criteria?
- True. But see, here is more important not voprosets such as legally formalized sotovarischestvo and voprosets decency, culture and ethical behavior consistent with respect to buddy buddy.

No comments:
Post a Comment