November 10 at the Capital Centre in Digital October public hearing will be held to mark the topic of "judicial" web. One of the main voprostsev at this event will be developing and improving state automated system (GAS) "Justice," a perfect introduction to the use of a single jurisdiction in the courts scheduled to finish in the main district in 2013.
At last week a member of the Public Chamber of Russia and Chairman of the Public Committee "Because of the sociability of justice" Denis Dvornikov published on Preimuschestvo.Ru note, which has, like advantages and shortcomings of discussion GAS "justice" must get out of the narrow limits of the circle and the client Executive and suggested a reader to put the native worldview. For future hearings, we publish the most noteworthy ideas of our readers and to recommend to extend the discussion on the site. Comments will be moderated exacting: please, speak directly to the creation of consistent difficulty - if a CEO "justice" must start better and more comfortable, and for whom all must do.Finally, according to published commentary by Dennis Dvornikova.
User with the alias Sleepless complains about the complexity of the system:
"... The court are not programmers, and lawyers and stuff, made by programmers dryuchki larger number did not understand the outright ..."
... Koiya still does not always respect the following applies:
"Apart from this, a person programke from time to time admitted procedural lapses, because of because of some reports are displayed incorrectly, and in order to remove them - you need a long time."
The reader who subscribes to both track what difficulties a lack of staff in the courts to work with the CEO:
"The creation and introduction of systems such as sonar," Justice ", different BCR, the agora, and others lead only to jobs involving all hands in the work of all managers in any other court, as all the appointment of arbitrators and assistant secretaries, ie those people who podsoblyat arbitrator shall pritvorenii in life of its main functions are reduced to the lack, because everyone is busy boxes, reports, graphs, dipersonifikatsiey court decisions, etc. "
Commentator KorporatiFF to give additional study of the system:
"The main voprosets - why does not the group conducted the study in order to optimize the unit operation of the court, taking into account the abilities of the CEO and the configuration annotations according to records management? Consistent with the results of the study to produce its proper completion of legal regulation and revision of the CEO 'Justice.'"
And yet still gives the option to improve Wotan CEO:
"Additional voprosets - Why not make the usability for users as Gus in Brasov (Banchok arbitral awards)? That the CEO" Justice "is in need of a single stock and comfortable access to it everyday ordinary people."
He is supported by Rodion Nikolayevich St. George:
"Indeed, nearly all of this work was allowed to zaavtomatizirovat level study of the judicial act. For what it depersonifitsirovat in general, if allowed in the header fields to orient 3-4-5" Complainant 1 "," Complainant 2 ", etc. What the arbitrator in this carefully outline a plaintiff, but according to the word will continue to use only the phrase "a plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Respondent 1 ..." "
Our reader Taradanov Roman said, as if to make depersonifikatsiyu Completely self-acting:
"There are innovations. "Mechanize" depersonifikatsiyu) Although a sane programmer in the absence of labor prescribe programku, koiya be in text files in the AutoCorrect replacement for the space of different names first letters of these names. "
User speaking of the name of an Army court gives a direct interest in the other delemu:
"In relation to innovation in the Code of Criminal Procedure (Part 4 st.240) was perhaps live questioning of witnesses and victims according to the means of video-link, zamechtatelno! That way as the term of military service composes a year, to the episode of the trial of criminal cases, witnesses and victims closer to disperse according to dwellings - from "Vladivostok Brest" and make their appearance in the tribunal is problematic or impossible (bailiffs report writing failure). Effectiveness of cases quite tormented! Just have a need for this web service in the first priority. "
Oleg said in his own commentary to the effect that a CEO "Justice" does not always act respectfully search:
"He turned not just to employees of the court, to find the one or the other act on the website. At first, honestly did not understand, why not publish the decision (I was an adept), and later, it turns out, though after that it was necessary that way insidiously characteristics of the search hypnotize, if space ships fit to throw. "
More on one dilemma, reports Rodion Nikolayevich St. George:
"There is a complaint in person and to the system. It yavna disunity 3 groups of users: software developers (whom all the easier to look at some no any MySQL) - clerks (whom basically show how these factors after the fact can not understand "The presiding in the Speaker As a part of the arbitrators - third arbitrator in the composition of Arbitrators - 2nd referee," etc.), and accomplices in the process, whom, for example, few manage day their case to appeal, but more fundamentally and the time at the websites of district court did not specify.
System detects the whole discharge gaps in the organization of our offices: and probably has a place to be every year, replacing the hotel business (why?) And not having a continuous numbering of cases, not having a no-connection or inter mir.arbitrami, district court of cassation, and (in the intention of the Office - any of them leads their database). "
No comments:
Post a Comment